Sunday, December 16, 2007

Recommended Reading: "Goodbye to All That"

Greetings all! I know it's been a long time since I chimed in on anything here - I've had a busy few months. As we get closer to the primaries I may be writing a bit more frequently, but that will depend on how things go. First, I simply want to recommend to everyone Andrew Sullivan's excellent Atlantic piece this month, "Goodbye to All That." Sullivan discusses Barack Obama's presidential candidacy, and asks what I think is the crucial question about this campaign:

"... Obama’s reach outside his own ranks remains striking. Why? It’s a good question: How has a black, urban liberal gained far stronger support among Republicans than the made-over moderate Clinton or the southern charmer Edwards? Perhaps because the Republicans and independents who are open to an Obama candidacy see his primary advantage in prosecuting the war on Islamist terrorism. It isn’t about his policies as such; it is about his person. They are prepared to set their own ideological preferences to one side in favor of what Obama offers America in a critical moment in our dealings with the rest of the world. The war today matters enormously. The war of the last generation? Not so much. If you are an American who yearns to finally get beyond the symbolic battles of the Boomer generation and face today’s actual problems, Obama may be your man."


"If you believe that America’s current crisis is not a deep one, if you think that pragmatism alone will be enough to navigate a world on the verge of even more religious warfare, if you believe that today’s ideological polarization is not dangerous, and that what appears dark today is an illusion fostered by the lingering trauma of the Bush presidency, then the argument for Obama is not that strong. Clinton will do. And a Clinton-Giuliani race could be as invigorating as it is utterly predictable.

But if you sense, as I do, that greater danger lies ahead, and that our divisions and recent history have combined to make the American polity and constitutional order increasingly vulnerable, then the calculus of risk changes. Sometimes, when the world is changing rapidly, the greater risk is caution. Close-up in this election campaign, Obama is unlikely. From a distance, he is necessary. At a time when America’s estrangement from the world risks tipping into dangerous imbalance, when a country at war with lethal enemies is also increasingly at war with itself, when humankind’s spiritual yearnings veer between an excess of certainty and an inability to believe anything at all, and when sectarian and racial divides seem as intractable as ever, a man who is a bridge between these worlds may be indispensable."

Read the whole thing. It's important.


At 12:40 PM, Anonymous said...

I agree in theory that a candidate that could cross racial divides would be nice, and one that could give at least some outreach to Muslims (although Obama is not a Muslim) would be helpful in today's world, it takes a great leap of faith to say that these qualities outweigh the many other qualifications a person should have for the presidency. Obama seems incredibly naive for world politics, and definitely lacks the managerial experience that he needs to run the country. With the right team around him, he could do fine, but that's an awfully big risk given the very dangers we face today.


Post a Comment

<< Home